Let’s the get the hardest part out of the way first. Doing this, and you can absorb this fact for the entirety of the review, and by the end, you’ll hopefully not want to remove my tooth from my mouth or one of the other many unpleasantries that occur in this film. What I must reveal is that I absolutely despise The Hangover, and I hated watching almost every part of it. To me, this is the exact way not to make a comedy, and has one of the stupidest plots I can remember. Or can’t remember like the characters of this film. Whatever.
The film sets up fine, and the basic idea isn’t a bad one. Four friends go to Las Vegas to have a bachelor party, they end up getting crazy drunk, do a bunch of terrible things, and wake up the next morning having absolutely no idea as to what happened — oh, and one of them is missing. Only three men wake up in the room. But there’s also a tiger in their hotel suite, and a baby. This set-up isn’t all that bad, but it takes a turn at “stupid” and keeps going south from there for the next hour or so, until the credits role.
Our characters are the first problem. There are really only three, because one of them is absent for the majority of the film. The leader of this group is named Phil (Bradley Cooper), who hates everything about his life. There is also Alan (Zach Galifianakis), the man-child of the group, and Stu (Ed Helms), someone who is almost more of a wimp than Alan. The groom, named Doug, is the missing person, which is a problem when the characters have a wedding to attend in the very near future.
The problem comes from the fact that not only are all of these characters jerks or wimps, but they’re also completely stupid. Okay, so their friend is missing. What’s the smartest thing to do in this case? How about checking in with the police. Hey, they were really drunk, he could have been arrested. Or if not, they could still help look. Is the hotel staff contacted? I can’t honestly recall, because I had to knock myself out after watching this. They eventually do talk to the police, but only because they try to steal a police car for no real reason. And what happens then? One of the worst scenes in the entire film.
The three stooges agree to participate in a taser demonstration in order to be released. So what happens is the cops allow children to shoot our leads repeatedly with a taser. And when one of them gets shot in the face, one of the cops — and these are stereotypical lazy cops, in case you were thinking we’d get deep side-characters — tells the kid to shoot again, “in the face”, he instructs. Nobody would act like this, unless the cop, for some reason, had a huge grudge on our characters. From what I can tell, this wasn’t the case, and even if it is, professionalism is supposed to be valued, is it not?
It’s not even realism that’s the big issue here, because this movie isn’t exactly realistic. If it was, I would hope that the tiger they wake up with would have eaten them in their drunken slumber. (Actually, looking back on it, I wish that the tiger would have done that.) But it’s just that the scene goes on and on and doesn’t even fit with the tone of the rest of the movie. Even though none of it’s funny, at least all of the jokes were relatively similar in nature and tone. This scene just didn’t fit, which made it stand out even more.
At one point in the film, they meet a man named Leslie Chow (Ken Jeong). Haha! His name is Leslie, which is often a girl’s name. Funny. Not! Anyway, he acts like a “Hollywood homosexual”, meaning he’s flamboyant and as feminine as a man can act without getting a sex change. Oh, and he’s got a really stereotypical Asian-who-speaks-lackluster-English voice, which makes all of his action seem so strange and funny. Again, “not”.
But this goes part in parcel with the rest of the film, which is just as unfunny. Okay, I laughed once when Mike Tyson shows up. Once. And that was only because I’m a sports fan and I laugh whenever an athlete that isn’t trying to be a real actor shows up in a movie. Nothing is funny about this film. The scenarios that these characters get themselves into are only because of their own stupidity, the characters are all bad people, so we want to see them fail, and gross-out comedies aren’t often all that funny in general.
The film is not offensive either, so don’t even try to bring up that I was “too offended to laugh at it”. That’s not what happened, I was just dumbfounded by the following points: (1) This script got sold, and sold for a reported $2 million; (2) That it got made and that a good actor in Bradley Cooper was forced to act in such a terrible film, and (3), that it made an incredible amount of money and everyone always tells me that I’m crazy for not liking it.
Usually when I’m told this, they claim I dislike it because I haven’t lived like these people, and therefore can’t relate to their situation. To put it bluntly, that’s crap. Have I ever played in the MLB? No, but I can enjoy baseball movies. Have I killed people? Not that you know of, but I can still enjoy serial killer films. That reason doesn’t fly with me, because the film doesn’t do a good enough job of forcing me to put myself, mentally, into their position. Instead, I wanted them put in jail, or like I said earlier, eaten by a tiger.
You know what would have made a better film? An hour and a half of watching a tiger “play” with them locked in their hotel room, before devouring them and slowly working through their bodies. And it can go take a nap every now and then, and we will watch it sleep. I would have honestly rather watched that than sit through this movie.
The ending doesn’t even make much sense. It comes at an arbitrary point in time, and happens just because a character magically remembers an event that happened the previous night. And then, mystery solved. Yay! I’m glad we wasted all that time watching stupid people do stupid things. That was totally worth it. For a final time, “not”.
Look, I know that a lot of people watched this movie, and that it made a lot of money and it’s supposedly hilarious, but I didn’t see any humor here. I saw failed attempts at humor sprinkled in-between morons acting as such. So if you want to trust me, and things that I generally dislike, you also dislike, stay far away. If you want to follow popular opinion, go ahead and watch The Hangover. I’ll wait patiently for anything nasty that’s coming my way. It can’t be any worse than sitting through this film another time.
Interesting rant, you did’nt like the film which is fair enough but i think your critique is over-the-top to say the least. I won’t try and persuade you that The Hangover is a good film because you clearly have no love for it whatsoever, but The Hangover is not an awful film, no matter how you feel about it.
What are some comedies you actually do like?
Let’s see.
“I Heart Huckabees”, “Just Peck”, “Scott Pilgrim vs. The World”, “Your Highness”, “In Bruges”, “Hot Tub Time Machine”, “The Princess Bride”, “Cellular” (I consider it a comedy), “Dogma”, “Cop Out”, “Greenberg”, “Mean Girls”….
I can list more if you want, but that should be a good enough selection, right?
Cop Out, and Your Highness are pretty terrible. I do like Dogma and Pilgrim, and In Bruges is probably in my top 5 of comedies, it’s indeed hysterical. I don’t see how Hot Tub Time Machine is any less stupid than The Hangover, though? In fact, I think it’s dumber than the Hangover. But, opinions differ I guess.
Yeah Hot Tub Time Machine contains very similar humour to The Hangover, in fact the film looked as if it was going to be a throwback to comedies from the 80’s but the finished product represented a typical modern day R-rated comedy, you know, just like The Hangover.
Cop Out was a massive disappointment in my opinion. Well apart from the hilarious scene with Sean William Scott.
Except the execution on “Hot Tub Time Machine” wasn’t awful. “The Hangover”, on the other hand, well, I think my rant speaks for itself. I just hated this movie.
“Hot Tub Time Machine” might have been just as stupid, but it’s done better. “Your Highness” was stupid too, but I found it hilarious.
Sorry man but i can’t see how you can say the characters in The Hangover are unlikeable when the characters in Hot Tub Time Machine are exactly the same!
Because in “Hot Tub Time Machine”, their main problem (being stuck in the 80’s) wasn’t exactly caused by them. They’re sent back in time not because they chose to, but because they were forced to.
In “The Hangover”, the characters drink themselves into a stupor, and then don’t follow a logical course of action in order to solve their problem.
Plus, the people in “Hot Tub Time Machine” had other problems in the present, ones that they have to work through and figure out how to solve, all while developing as a character. In “The Hangover”, their problems are caused because these people are stupid, or just plain not very good. Isn’t it implied that one of them is a child molester? Or something like that? Yeah, that’s a good character right there.
Your problem is that they’re not logical? Barely any of the characters in the films you mentioned are. But whatever, like I said, opinions differ.
That is just one of the problems I have, but yes, their actions do not make much sense if you step back and think for a second what you should do in that situation.
Surely a bunch of guys getting drunk and drugged in Vegas, and waking up the next day with the worse Hangover imagineable is a far more plausible plot than a bunch of guys getting drunk, jumping into a hot tub that then turns out to be a time machine! lol
The basic premise is more plausible, yes. But the way these characters react, and their actions throughout the film, are not.
Either way, both films had a different view of humor. The Hangover was shock humor and much more crass, potty-talk. Where as the Hot Tub Time Machine was more funny in a conventional sense like hearing or seeing something and saying “that was actually funny.” Both films have NOTHING on many of the under-seen, under-appreciated comedies of our day, but they are both worthy of being watched. Going into them with speculation of “oh, these are all talk” is one of the worst things ever, so just go in with low standards, and let the films let you laugh. There isn’t enough of it in the world anyway.
Well said, but i thought The Hangover was one of the funniest films of recent times and not just because it was a massive hit, The Hangover came out of nowhere and took people and the box-office by surprise and theirs nothing wrong with that. The shock-value of the gags was its strong point for sure.
Hot Tub Time Machine had just as much crude humour as The Hangover in my opinion.
Eh… to each his own hahaha.
I guess it is simply not your type of film. I thought from the previews and such that I might not like it because it seemed a bit over the top. I watched it anyways because I wanted a good laugh. The movie was hysterical to me. In comparison to many of the unoriginal comedies that keep appearing, this was just over the top fun. It was meant to be fun and ridiculous and I really enjoyed it, especially the antics of Ken Jeong and “The Man-Child,” Zach Galifianakis. I totally agree with DC that “The shock-value of the gags was its strong point.”
Well, the main characters being stupid is part of the fun. I guess you’re not really into movies where the main characters are stupid in general,
It’s fine, people are entitled to their own taste.